
Provenance
Probably acquired by Alexander Hamilton, 10th Duke of Hamilton (1767-1852); William Hamilton, 11th Duke of Hamilton (1811-1864); inherited by William Hamilton, 12th Duke of Hamilton (1845-1895), and sold as part of the collection of Hamilton Palace in 1882; acquired by Baron Ferdinand de Rothschild (1839-1898) in 1882; inherited by Alice de Rothschild (1847-1922) in 1898; inherited by James de Rothschild (1878-1957) in 1922; bequeathed by James de Rothschild to the National Trust in 1957.
Anonymous artist, probably Roman
Pair of Egyptian Porphyry Vases
About 1670-1700
Egyptian red porphyry
H. 68 cm
Waddesdon Manor, Buckinghamshire (nos 144.1995.1; 144.1995.2)

A Tale of Two Porphyry Vases

The history of the Egyptian porphyry vases currently held at Waddesdon Manor offers a fascinating insight into British collecting (figs 1-2). Originally part of the Hamilton Palace collection, the vases appear in the 1850s Inventory of the 11th Duke of Hamilton (1811-1864) and the 1876 Inventory of the 12th Duke of Hamilton (1845-1895), where they were recorded in the Marble Hall.[1] A defining moment in their history occurred in 1882, when they appeared in Christie’s sale of the Hamilton Palace collection. The pair was acquired by the prominent dealer Samson Wertheimer (1811-1892) for £1365, acting on behalf of Baron Ferdinand de Rothschild (1839-1898).[2]


Figures 1-2. Anonymous Roman (?) artist, Pair of Louis XIV Egyptian Porphyry Vases, about 1670-1700, Egyptian red porphyry, H. 68 cm, Buckinghamshire, Waddesdon Manor (Inv. no. 144.1995.1; 144.1995.2).
Passionate about history, Ferdinand de Rothschild was also very interested in where the artworks he collected came from (what we call provenance). No price was too great for a piece associated with a personality, or significant collector from the past. Famously Samson Wertheimer bid a staggering £6000 at the Hamilton Palace Sale for Baron Ferdinand for a Writing Table that was clearly documented as having once belonged to Queen Marie Antoinette (r. 1777-1792) of France (now at Waddesdon Manor, no. 2546). To understand why Samson Wertheimer was prepared to pay the sum of £1365 for the porphyry vases at this same sale, one must first examine the material itself and its significance. Porphyry is far more than a mere mineral; for two millennia, it has served as a physical manifestation of sovereign power. Known as lapis porphyrites in Antiquity, this exceptionally dense volcanic stone was sourced from a single, desolate location: Mount Gebel Dokhan.[3] Its deep purple hue, produced by minute particles of haematite, mirrored the ‘Tyrian purple’ dye extracted from murex snails, a pigment so prohibitively expensive that its use was restricted by law.[4] From the Constantinian era onwards, porphyry was solidified as the ‘Imperial Stone’, reserved for the sarcophagi of emperors and the monolithic columns of the most sacred basilicas. Following the collapse of the Roman Empire, the Egyptian quarries were lost to the Western world, only to be rediscovered in 1822 by James Burton (1786-1862) and John Gardner Wilkinson (1797-1875).[5] Consequently, every work of porphyry produced during the Renaissance or the Baroque era was spoliated and recycled. To possess a porphyry vase in the seventeenth or eighteenth century was to own a literal fragment of Rome, reconfigured and polished into a contemporary form. The significance of this noble material, as well as the artistic value of the vases, would not have been lost on Baron Ferdinand.

Figure 3. Alessandro Algardi and Silvio Calci, Pair of amphorae with serpentine handles, 1638, black Belgian marble, 90 × 52 cm, Rome, Galleria Borghese (Inv. no. CCXIX).
While the Waddesdon pair of vases is frequently categorised as ‘Louis XIV’, their artistic lineage is fundamentally Roman. The design comprises an urn-shaped body with fluted bowls and distinctive handles cast in the form of twisted serpents biting the rim. This specific motif is a hallmark of the mid-seventeenth-century Roman Baroque. It closely follows a celebrated design by the sculptor Alessandro Algardi (1598–1654), originally executed in black marble by the specialist Silvio Calci from Velletri (active 1600-1650) for Marcantonio Borghese Principe di Sulmona (1601-1658) (fig. 3).[6] The fact that the Waddesdon vases are very similar to another porphyry Vase with serpentine handles in the Louvre, which has been dated to the seventeenth century and is believed to have originated in Rome, suggests that they were either produced in Rome, or by a French artist inspired by Roman vase typologies of the period (fig. 6).[7]

Figure 4. Anonymous Roman (?) artist, Vase with serpentine handles, 1650-1690, Egyptian red porphyry, 72 × 54 × 40 cm, Paris, Musée du Louvre (Inv. no. MR 2816).
The persistent association of the vases with the ‘Louis XIV’ style reminds us that artistic production in France during the reign of the so-called Sun King, King Louis XIV of France (1643-1715), was greatly influenced by the work of craftspeople across Europe. As such, the ‘Louis XIV style’ grew out of a cross-fertilisation of European creativity.
[1] Hamilton Palace Archive, Acc. no. 1228-00106: Inventory of Hamilton Palace Collection, 1850s: https://archive.vhpt.scot/imageview/1836 [accessed 05-02-2026]; Acc. no. TD200000001-00016: Inventory of the Furniture, Pictures, Articles of Hamilton Palace, 1876: https://archive.vhpt.scot/imageview/1984 [accessed 05-02-2026].
[2] Christie’s London, The Hamilton Palace Collection. Illustrated Price Catalogue, 17 June - 20 July 1882, p. 134.
[3] Dario del Bufalo, Porphyry: Red Imperial Porphyry. Power and Religion (Umberto Allemandi, 2018), p. 55.
[4] Philippe Malgouyres, Clément Blanc-Riehl (eds), Porphyre. La Piette Pourpre des Ptolémées aux Bonapart (Musée du Louvre, 2003), p. 9.
[5] Del Bufalo, Porphyry, pp. 13-34.
[6] Sonia Felici, Pair of Amphorae with Serpentiform Handles, Algardi Alessandro / Calci Silvio, inv. CCXIX, 2024, Rome: Galleria Borghese. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12732865 [accessed 05-02-2026]; Italo Faldi, Galleria Borghese. Le sculture dal sec. XVI al XIX (Istituto Poligrafico dello Stato, 1954), pp. 10-11, cat. no. 3; Jennifer Montagu, Alessandro Algardi, 2 vols (Yale University Press, 1985), vol. II, p. 461.
[7] Malgouyres and Blanc-Riehl, Porphyre, p. 114, no. 28.